[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 2 (12-2023) ::
IHJ 2023, 8(2): 10-19 Back to browse issues page
Jurisprudential-medical investigation of the influence of the father's shame in abortion treatment before ensoulment
Reza Heydarian Baei * , Hadi Mahmodian Barezi
Department of Islamic Studies, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Reza.3013@Yahoo.Com
Abstract:   (719 Views)
Background and aim: Abortion is one of the most important jurisprudential-medical and legal issues, which receives great attention due to the inherent dignity of human beings. Therefore, Islamic jurisprudence, considering the right to life and the inherent dignity of human beings, comprehensively and completely deals with all aspects of abortion, and the only place where abortion is allowed is the conflict between the life of the mother and the life of the fetus, and this is before fetus ensoulment, and it is not permissible to perform abortion after ensoulment. However, considering that the mother is not the only participant in the birth and care of the child, and it is a mutual responsibility that the parents must undertake as a couple, a question is thus raised: Does father's hardship and shame justify abortion?
Materials and methods: To find the answer to the above question, we decided to explain and analyze the viewpoints of jurists and their evidence using the descriptive-analytical method and the collection of documentary-written materials, through the collection of opinions and the comparison of their viewpoints in library references and applications.
Findings: The findings of the research show that the father's hardship and shame does not grant permission for abortion; rather, there must be something more important than the life of the fetus for abortion to be permitted.
Conclusion: By analyzing the views of the jurists, it was found that the father's hardship and shame cannot be a valid reason for granting permission for abortion. For this reason, the point of view of the jurists who consider the hardship and shame of the father as a reason for the permissibility of abortion, can be analyzed and criticized.
Keywords: Abortion, Hardship and shame, Father, Islamic jurisprudence, Medical
Full-Text [PDF 799 kb]   (105 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/10/17 | Accepted: 2023/12/31 | Published: 2024/01/21
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heydarian Baei R, Mahmodian Barezi H. Jurisprudential-medical investigation of the influence of the father's shame in abortion treatment before ensoulment. IHJ 2023; 8 (2) :10-19
URL: http://iahj.ir/article-1-301-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 2 (12-2023) Back to browse issues page
نشریه اسلام و سلامت Islam And Health Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645